Patrick J Battuello

Archive for the ‘Hunting’ Category

All Hunting (Not Just Canned) Is Unsportsmanlike

In Animal Cruelty Law, Hunting on June 28, 2011 at 12:07 pm

“Canned hunts are cruel and unsportsmanlike. The practice of killing tame, exotic animals within the confines of an enclosure where the animals have no chance of escape is contrary to the principles of fair chase, sportsmanship and common decency. Captive hunts are out of step with common principles governing responsible hunting and should be banned.” (Congressman Steve Cohen)

“Canned hunting is not a real sport. It is abhorrent and cruel, and there is really no hunting involved.” (Congressman Brad Sherman)

The HSUS has recently endorsed a new House bill aimed at curtailing the canned hunting industry (Fred’s Death). The bill, Sportsmanship in Hunting Act of 2011, only applies to the interstate (federal jurisdiction) trade of an “exotic animal” (a mammal “not indigenous to the United States”) “for the purposes of allowing the killing or injuring of that animal for entertainment or for the collection of a trophy.” It would also criminalize (up to five years) computer-assisted remote hunting (shooting animals with your mouse), which is not currently a problem.

There are roughly 1,000 American ranches, or preserves, offering captive exotics (or simple whitetails and pheasants) for sacrifice. Here, you can enjoy the charms of a rustic lodge, home cooking, beautiful scenery (including many of the vanquished), and the exhilaration of the impending track and kill. When successful, and you will be successful, your pride must be preserved for posterity. The process is sad: Securely enclosed (zero chance for escape), the typically docile, tame, and trusting animals are destroyed for racks and photo ops. And what better way to initiate the young and hone nascent skills (third paragraph from the end)? Logic dictates that not everyone gets off a clean kill-shot, especially those who frequent these ranches, so their practice often come at the expense of an animal’s protracted death.

Still, the politicians’ quotes merit a closer look. The American hunting experience is steeped in a tradition of airy rhetoric: honorable sportsmanship, respect for the animal, communion with nature, bonding with forebears, and rite of passage. These “common principles” are so ingrained that arguments to the contrary are viewed as heresy promulgated by the ignorant. But how exactly is hunting a sport (Man vs Mallard)? What, do tell, constitutes a “fair chase”? Are the decidedly benign deer and duck (who would not be protected by this law) worthy adversaries? Sport implies competition (nonlethal, of course) between willing rivals. Someone, then, should inform these creatures that they’re in a game.

Well-meaning as this bill may be (Rep. Cohen, owing to his initiatives on crush videos and horse transport, was honored by the HSUS earlier this year), it is irrational to protect some species from this brand of cruelty, but not others. Also, the “fair chase” argument, along with humane culling and ecological balancing, is specious. It is what hunters tell themselves to justify their pursuit of pleasure. In short, all human hunting of animals is, by definition, unsportsmanlike. It’s high time for hunters to get over themselves.

Man vs Mallard

In Ducks, Geese, Hunting, Religion on September 24, 2010 at 12:11 pm

Former Arkansas governor Mike Huckabee, an ordained Baptist minister who once said, “I hope we answer the alarm clock and take this nation back for Christ,” shared the joy of mallard hunting with a 2007 NRA audience: “To watch mallards come in a flock, cut their wings and land but a few feet in front of you on a cold winter day near Stuttgart, Arkansas, is just about as close to heaven as I think one can get on this Earth. And as one who believes, because of my faith, that I’m going to Heaven, I’m pretty sure there will be duck hunting in Heaven, and I can’t wait.” Hunter Huckabee is fooling no one with his spiritual rhetoric. Ultimately, he is motivated by a base, macho desire to kill. And that is hardly a Christian virtue.

Waterfowl (ducks, geese, brant) hunting is highly regulated in NYS. No rifles, handguns, traps, snares, or nets. Machine guns and explosives, too, are prohibited. And please, leave poisons and drugs at home. After all, the competition must be fair. Curiously, sink boxes (a float that conceals one’s body beneath the surface) are banned, but blinds (and ponchos?) are fine so long as they’re labeled with name and address. Only paraplegics and amputees can shoot from cars, and “you may not shoot crippled birds when under power.” Decoys are allowed, but they mustn’t be live. Use calls at your leisure, but no electronics, amplifiers, or tapes. And no bait. The DEC also expects you to “make a reasonable effort to retrieve all killed or crippled birds.” How very magnanimous.

In NY, the minimum age to enjoy this timeless tradition is 12. In 1996, the enlightened folks at the DEC established the two-day preseason Youth Waterfowl Days. This is a special time for children to get their feet wet, so to speak. Very exciting. Many fathers use the annual duck slaughter to forge family bonds. One hunting service boasts that “without a doubt, the biggest rush in water fowling is for the sea ducks. On some days it is literally shooting as fast as you can load your gun. …an unforgettable experience.”

Within the hunter’s code lies some convoluted notion of the fair chase (or, as the case may be, the hide, lure, and fire away), and towards that end, the aforementioned limits have been established. But I would argue that this fairness doctrine applies not to the adversaries in question, but rather to equitably maintaining a bountiful supply for all (hunters) to enjoy. For in this titanic struggle between man and mallard, some unfair (if you were a duck) advantages (guns, blinds, decoys, calls) are deemed acceptable, while others (laying waste with battery guns and grenades) are not. The ducks, it should be noted, have no desire to participate in this game. They are simply flying for their lives.

While Mike Huckabee and Joseph Classen, Catholic priest and passionate hunting advocate, unabashedly invoke God’s name as they wantonly destroy his creations, my Catholic school upbringing informs otherwise. The nuns and brothers described a God (Jesus) who embodies love, compassion, mercy, and, life. Seems a rather difficult reconciliation to make. Shooting defenseless ducks on a Saturday afternoon is not communing with nature, nor is it a necessary evil for ecological balance. It is a leisure activity in which some animals suffer if only wounded, while others die a premature death. Hunters hunt, primarily, because it is fun. And there is no better example of this than shooting, “as fast as you can load your gun,” the menacing waterfowl. Mike Huckabee, noble warrior, must burst with pride at the day’s harvest. And, at least for him, God smiles approvingly.

Alligator Accessories

In Alligator Farming, Alligators, Hunting on August 5, 2010 at 1:06 am

“There’s a bumper sticker down here that says, ‘If you want to save an alligator, buy a handbag,’ and that’s completely true. We wish we could get people to understand that. If you buy an alligator product, you’re supporting the conservation of wetlands and the preservation of critical habitat… It’s an act of conservation.” (Ruth Elsey, wildlife biologist, Rockefeller Wildlife Refuge in Louisiana)

In an effort to preserve wetlands, Louisiana offers private landowners (who own 75% of alligator habitat) a financial incentive not to convert their land to something else. It is called Alligator Marsh to Market (1972). Before the program, alligator hunting was largely unregulated, and population levels became dangerously low. Hunting was banned, and the American Alligator was designated an endangered species. As numbers increased, alligator farming (circa 1985), in combination with the annual September hunt (some 35,000 strong), became the state-sanctioned remedy (to “provide long term benefits to the survival of the species, maintain its habitats, and provide significant economic benefits to landowners, alligator farmers and alligator hunters”). Economic benefits: approaching $1 billion since inception. The Louisiana Alligator Advisory Council says that over $20 million is generated annually between the hunted alligators and the eggs harvested for farm production. Big business, backed by a healthy dose of government propaganda, is firmly entrenched.

First, eggs are harvested (hundreds of thousands per year) and sent to farms to incubate, hatch, and grow. A year or two (and 3-4 feet) later, the young reptiles are sold for slaughter (or processed on-site). Some (around 15%) are transplanted back into the wild to maintain sustainable numbers. Insta-Gator Ranch & Hatchery in Louisiana says, “Today there are more alligators indoors in Louisiana than there were in the wilds of Louisiana before the ranching program started in 1985.” The skin and meat are valuable commodities. National Geographic reports that 75% of the world’s wild hides and 85% of farmed hides come from Louisiana.

Mark Porter, proud owner of Porter’s Gator Processing and Gator Farm, was a novice (with only hunting experience) when he opened for business. The NY Times reports: “When he noticed that refrigerated air seemed to kill the animals, he would pile them up in his walk-in refrigerator and skin them when they stopped moving. Only later did he realize that they were not dead, but dormant, and he was skinning them alive. ‘Now we just hit them on the head with a baseball bat,’ he said.” When the Times writer was introduced to the gator house, Porter remarked, “I’m fixing to hammer these guys right after Christmas.” The uses for alligator skin are limited only by imagination. As for the meat, Asian chefs prize the legs (“like baby dinosaur drumsticks”), and Porter joked, “You put one on a plate and it looks like the biggest frog leg you’ve ever seen.” Even the head (boiled, shellacked, and sold as an ornament) has value.

Information on the actual slaughter is scarce (alligators are not specifically protected under the Humane Slaughter Act), though this description comes from the Animal Rights Foundation of Florida: “Slaughter on alligator farms is often inhumane. Alligators are clubbed with hammers or shot with a bangstick, while some farms sever the spinal cord using axes or sharp wedges, leaving the animal alive but paralyzed while he or she is skinned. It is not uncommon for alligators to be skinned while still breathing, their eyes open and fully conscious.”

Crocodilian biologist Timothy Scott (who was paid by farmers to determine the best diet for high meat and leather yields) admits to misgivings about the program: (Science Daily, 8/13/01) “In some ways, I think it is unfortunate because they are supposed to be here and we are encroaching on their habitat. By and large, they leave people alone…. They have more fear of us than we do of them.” But then he reverts to the company line: “Some staunch environmentalists and animal rights activists should be aware that the only way we have been able to protect and save crocodilians around the world is to use them as a renewable natural resource.” Sad that he uses his intelligence this way. Alligators are sentient creatures, not “renewable resources.”

It should be clear whose interests are truly being served. Biologists are enlisted to lobby the public with disingenuous babble about bags and belts benefiting alligators (who can live 50+ years if humans would simply let them be where they are). I’d sooner the American Alligator disappear than be subjected to pain, suffering, and premature death; all done, ostensibly, in the name of conservation. Animal advocates are not arguing against the preservation of wetlands, only the means to achieve it.

Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.