“As a veterinarian I realize the inevitability of euthanasia in certain cases, but to equate the slaughter process with humane euthanasia is the height of hypocrisy.” (Dr. John Griggs, DVM)
“The horse slaughter industry is a predatory one that exists only because there is a profit to be made by fulfilling consumer demand in overseas markets for horse flesh.” (Professor Nicholas Dodman, Tufts University School of Veterinary Medicine)
A debate rages in the U.S. over the fate of unwanted horses. There is a bill pending (H.R. 503/S.727) that would federally prohibit horse slaughtering in America (as of now, any state wishing to open a new slaughterhouse could do so) and make transporting horses to slaughter in other countries illegal (which will be very difficult to enforce: auctioneers, buyers, and shippers could simply claim they are being used for other purposes).
The AVMA recommends reopening American slaughterhouses as another option for overpopulation (as with pets, not enough good homes; they claim that 2,700 new rescue sites may be needed each year). At least on American soil, the AVMA argues, there will be government oversight (dubious). Although chemical euthanasia (pentobarbital) with proper disposal remains the best choice, the AVMA believes that gunshot and captive bolt are also acceptable (and quicker, cheaper, and more environmentally friendly) methods that combined with slaughter can be part of a larger remedy.
The AVMA is concerned that owners who once saw the auction as a viable option would, if that option were removed, be “more likely to abandon, abuse, or neglect the horses.” No statistics, however, support this claim. The bill, the AVMA states, “ignores the real issue—what do we do with all of these unwanted horses.”
The position of the Veterinarians for Equine Welfare: “It is the united opinion of the Veterinarians for Equine Welfare (VEW) that horse slaughter is inhumane, and that it is an unacceptable way to end a horse’s life under any circumstance. We believe that it is an unethical and dangerous practice…to attempt to equate horse slaughter with humane euthanasia.” (others against horse slaughter)
The VEW reminds that euthanasia means “good death” and should only be used if in the best interest of the horse. A healthy horse (and over 90% of the horses sent to American slaughterhouses were; healthy horses make for better meat and greater profits) clearly has an interest in not being destroyed. Veterinarian Linda Breitman says: “I am appalled that the AVMA supports this inhumane treatment of horses. The practice of sending “unwanted horses” to slaughter is simply a matter of economic convenience for uncaring or uneducated horse owners. The cost of humane euthanasia is similar to the cost of keeping a horse for one month. Anyone who keeps horses, whether for profit or pleasure, should be able to plan for this final expense.” Chemical euthanasia with disposal costs around $225 (Animal Welfare Institute), so clearly, expense (especially to people wealthy enough to have owned horses) has no serious relevance. And, chemical euthanasia is usually administered at the horse’s home (or a nearby hospital), thus eliminating transport and slaughterhouse distress.
Renowned veterinarian Holly Cheever told me recently that she suspects “their [AVMA] support for slaughter has a lot to do with the “slippery slope” concept—if humans begin to think of slaughter as cruel, what will that do to the beef/swine/lamb industry?-and also, many of the equine vets and owners coming from the “cowboy” states do not see horses as companion animals as the northeast tends to do and thus they support slaughter for them as they do for all agricultural animals across the board.” Dr. Cheever does not believe that prohibiting slaughter will result in more abandonment/neglect.
A friend of mine who has owned and raced trotters for decades says that the decision to part ways with a horse is a difficult (and emotional) one. Many choose auction in the hope that their horses will find new homes. For them, an unknown fate is better than a definitive death. Most of these horses, he explains, are still young and healthy and should not die. So, they delude themselves into believing that it won’t be their horse who is trucked to Mexico. He also says equine owners (in fairness, some are attempting to police themselves) believe it a bit hypocritical to rebuke horse slaughter: each year in the U.S., some 100,000 horses (representing only 10-20% of the total who die) are sent to slaughter while 10 billion farm animals suffer a similar fate. In other words, don’t decry horse slaughter while eating a steak. Reasonable? Yes. Justification for butchering intelligent and sensitive creatures? I think not.

