Patrick J Battuello

Archive for the ‘Bulls’ Category

The Art of Toreo

In Bullfighting, Bulls on July 11, 2010 at 1:12 pm

“If I were prime minister, I would ban the bullfights, but until that time I continue to attend.” (Spanish writer Ramon Perez de Ayala)

“The tradition is to call toreo an art, and I got nods of agreement from bullfighters and fans whenever I suggested an analogy to jazz, since every combination of bull and bullfighter elicits a different, irreproducible, unpredictable, improvised performance.” (Michael Kimmelman, NY Times, 6/1/08)

Michael Kimmelman, Ivy League graduate and chief art critic for the NY Times, considers bullfighting beautiful art (indeed, reviews are carried on the culture pages), and he finds it disgraceful to cheapen the performance by blunting the bull’s horns or deliberately breeding docility. Kimmelman writes that “the true goal is bringing out the innate bravery and nobility and distinct character of each bull” and suggests we keep an “open mind.” Having previously written on bullfighting particulars, it still bears repeating what Kimmelman compares to jazz…

Although a 2006 Gallup poll revealed that 72% of Spaniards have no interest in watching a bullfight (up from 46% in 1987), many remain proud and defiant in the face of international pressure. Kimmelman quotes sociologist Lorenzo Navarrete Moreno: “They [Spanish people] say they’re against killing a bull but against banning corridas too. People continue to cling to a notion of national identity even if it entails something they don’t like.” The transplanted American journalist (and fan) Bill Lyon says that “most Spaniards aren’t interested in toreo and many are against it — that is, until somebody from the outside tries to prohibit it.”

Spanish state television no longer airs live fights, and Catalonia is on the verge of banning them entirely. Animal advocacy groups have taken root in Spain over the past 20 years, and the corrida is the central issue. Writing in the Guardian (6/6/10), Paul Richardson notes: “Right up until the turn of the 21st century, to be a bullfight objector was to be stigmatised as lily-livered and unpatriotic. …The antitaurino movement is increasingly vociferous, dynamic and committed.”

In response to their Catalan rivals, Madrid moved to protect bullfighting as an artform, lumping the preservation of historical buildings with the public torture and killing of sentient beings. Speaking for the city’s conservative party, Esperanza Aquirre referenced great artists (Picasso, Goya, Hemingway, Welles) as passionate aficionados. German photographer Anya Bartels-Suermondt, who recently published a book on Jose Tomas, calls toreo an “artistic union of man and animal” and says, “I respect the opinions of those who don’t enjoy the spectacle – but the bullfight is part of world culture, and also deserves our respect. Abolition would be a tragic blow to our democratic right of self-expression.”

Perhaps, though, the most corrupt defense comes from the French philosopher Francis Wolff: (The Observer, 3/7/10) “They have been conserved as a breed precisely because of their bravery. The only use they have is exactly the one for which they have been bred.” In other words, without the bullfight, fighting bulls would cease to exist. So, in effect, toreo proponents are responsible conservationists. Wow.

In spite of the escalating controversy, the tradition (a tradition, by the way, that fetes a child-slayer) endures. While in Spain, Kimmelman met with another famous torero, Cayetano Rivera. Rivera (who described the feeling of being “in the clouds with the bull”) was reflective and almost apologetic: “I’m not a hunter, and the first time I killed a bull it didn’t feel good. It was shocking. Nobody loves the bull more than the bullfighter, that’s for sure. But it’s a responsibility, and it wouldn’t be fair to have someone else kill the bull. It’s only fair that I risk my life doing it.” To be clear, there is nothing fair about a bullfight. The bull will be tortured, and he will die. And no amount of romantic rhetoric will alter that reality.

While true, as bullfighting enthusiasts assert, that the toro’s suffering and death is no worse than his beef-cattle brother’s, no one is waxing poetic about factory farms and slaughterhouses. Ernest Hemingway wrote: (Death in the Afternoon) “Bullfighting is the only art in which the artist is in danger of death and in which the degree of brilliance in the performance is left to the fighter’s honour.” Art? Culture? Honor? Tradition? Alas, the lies men tell themselves, and the bloodstained rationalizations they spew to the rest of us.

Civilized Barbarity: Bullfighting in the 21st Century

In Bullfighting, Bulls on July 7, 2010 at 1:18 pm

sadism: gratification derived from causing pain

That bulls are ritualistically tortured and slain before thousands of cheering fans in the 21st Century seems surreal. Yet, according to the World Society for the Protection of Animals, some 250,000 bulls are killed in rings annually (40,000 in Europe, 210,000 in Latin America). 250,000.

Each year, Pamplona’s famous Running of the Bulls garners widespread media attention. Curiously, though, the coverage usually stops short of the bullring and the animals’ final fates. For the uninitiated, here is what happens:

Amid palpable excitement, the players parade into the arena, replete with ceremonial music and traditional garb. First, the matador (translated: killer) and his assistants, or banderilleros, will test the bull’s athleticism as he makes several passes at the cape. A mounted (the horse, to avoid ugly disembowelment, must wear protection that doesn’t always protect) picador will then thrust a lance into the bull’s neck. This sheds the first blood and serves to weaken the adversary. The banderilleros will then pierce the bull with barbed sticks (up to 6) to prep him for the final act. At this point, the bleeding bull will have difficulty holding his head aloft, and his compromised state facilitates the endgame. He is hurt, desperate, and confused.

The tercio de muerte begins with the unaccompanied matador re-emerging, carrying only his red cape (the color is irrelevant, for bulls are colorblind) and sword. The great toreros, being showmen first, incite several more passes from the wounded and exhausted bull before proceeding to the crescendo. The sword is plunged between the shoulder blades to the heart. Death, hopefully. But, as they are attacking a half-ton animal, their aim may be amiss (sometimes a lung is punctured, drowning the bull in his own blood), and the spinal cord must be severed with a knife. The matador will then absorb the wild applause. A particularly satisfied audience will petition for an ear or two as reward to the brave and dashing slayer, done, of course, in full view. For a pictorial account, click here and here.

Michael Kimmelman (Bullfighting Is Dead! Long Live the Bullfight!), NY Times art critic (yes, art critic), visited Spain to experience this particular version of Spanish culture and to capture the essence of bullfighting’s greatest artist, the larger-than-life (and elusive) Jose Tomas. On this day, Tomas’ first muse was treated thus: “Tomás finally thrust his sword between the bull’s shoulders, stopping his banderilleros from trying to exhaust the dying animal further. The matador waited, watching, as the bull first kneeled, then, like a demolished building, crumbled. People threw flowers, their seat cushions and stuffed animals while horses dragged the carcass away and Tomás, looking pleased with himself, took a triumphant lap around the ring.”

The sequel did not go as planned. The bull, bleeding and winded, became lethargic early. Tomas’ banderilleros tried pulling his tail, but he kept falling. The show had been jeopardized. Then, in ghastly theatrical fashion and “almost like a hypnotist, Tomás got the crippled, staggering animal to rise to his bait, and matador and bull managed a series of hair-raising, heartbreaking passes.” Here, Kimmelman, a cultured and respected journalist, actually questions whether this was prolonged torture or inspired genius. Finally: “The kill was appalling. After Tomás got the sword in, having bungled his first try, an assistant stabbed the fallen, struggling animal 11 times in the base of the head with his dagger before finally polishing him off by severing the spinal column. It was sickening. The crowd, displeased, counted each thrust, tauntingly. José Tomás walked off, shamed and distraught.”


Bullfighting remains legal and somewhat popular in southern France and Portugal (their no-kill corridas are anything but: the gravely injured bulls are simply killed off-camera), and it flourishes in Latin America (Mexico City is home to the world’s largest plaza de toros). But, as Kimmelman writes, “AS SPAIN GOES, so goes toreo….” Variously described as art, sport, or barbarity, bullfighting is perhaps the most polarizing issue in Spain today…

Pamplona’s Shame

In Bulls, Running of the Bulls on July 3, 2010 at 1:10 pm

Animals suffer at human hands in numbers almost incomprehensible (50 billion annually for food alone), but the celebration of that suffering occupies unique ground, reserved for the most morally-bankrupt our species offers. Pamplona’s Running of the Bulls, the main event during the San Fermin Fiesta, proves that despite our posturing part of our moral code remains frozen in antiquity. For one week each July, six terrified bulls are herded towards a gruesome death (itself, a level of depravity that would leave Darwin questioning evolution) by a mass of holiday revelers. The runners are described as courageous, daring, reckless, zany. Attracting international attention, the run makes for great theater, with spectators titillated by the prospect of men being thrown and trampled. What frivolity.


The fiesta is the heart of Pamplona tourism, and other than a prohibition against RWI, the mandate is to have fun. One site says, “This run only takes about three minutes, but it is a truly amazing and life changing experience for all involved.” For the bulls, life-ending. But first, they are tormented. Goaded by thousands, panicked by loud noises (bell-wearing oxen, cheering fans), and guided by young men wielding rolled newspapers and long sticks, the bulls slip and slide their way through unfamiliar cobblestone streets, becoming disoriented and frightened along the way. The run is marketed as adventurous competition with a dash of danger thrown in (the 15 deaths, prominently mentioned in Pamplona’s city guide, almost seem a matter of pride). That this is part of a religious festival, complete with prayers for protection to Saint Fermin, makes the run (and subsequent fight) a perversion with few equals.

ESPN should be ashamed (though, I’m sure they are not) that they cover this opening act to slaughter as sport. A more enlightened future will wonder how people could mock an animal’s fear and how the rest of us could abide it. Ernest Hemingway’s The Sun Also Rises (1926) is oft-credited with introducing Americans to the Pamplona tradition, even inspiring future runners. There is obvious irony in that classic’s title, for there will be no rising sun for this month’s running bulls. Their distress, mere entertainment. Their subsequent destruction, sad spectacle.

Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.